I’ve had the incredible opportunity to have many conversations with Mama Lucy, and some of the parents at the school, about the many various ways that “aid” has been provided in their country. I’ve sat over chai at Lucy’s table and discussed our mutual frustrations with many failed, and some quite arrogant, approaches. I thought you might be interested to hear some of her thoughts, too. I realize, of course, that whatever she shares is now cast through the lens that she is our partner, but nonetheless I think she expresses a frank, thoughtful position that you’ll likely find interesting and thought-provoking. If you have questions, I’d encourage you to ask them directly to her. Though her internet access is somewhat limited, I’m sure she’ll be excited to respond as soon as she’s able.
Mama Lucy’s first language is Swahili, but she speaks remarkable English. I’ve no doubt that you’ll be able to understand the meaning of her note. Additionally, since we hope to build an online community where people from both of our cultures can meaningfully connect, I believe it’s imperative for us to begin to share these communications without mediation.
When I asked her to share with you her perspectives on aid, and our approach in particular, Mama Lucy wrote:
Dear Epic Changers,
What is aid?
According to Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, it has the following meaning:
- Money, food, etc. that is sent to help in difficult situations.
- Help that you need to perform a particular task.
- Help that is given to a person.
Now let’s come to the point.
Those definitions give us a picture of how beautiful it is. For me, an aid seems to be a very good thing too, but it has two sides. One, it depends on how an aid giver decides to give (the approach). To the right people/community/country at the right time through those who have direct connection to the targeted group.
The other side, it depends on how an aid receiver is prepared to use/utilize such aid. Positively or otherwise. Someone can decide to send an aid with very good intention to help a community to cater a certain need, but can end up with no good impact. The receiver must be related to that need. There must be connection between the two.
Giving aid through “participatory approach” can bring great change to a community. Such community can value what they have participated in, rather than what they’ve just received ready made.
Epic Change has this unique approach of giving aid to our community. (participatory approach). They support us by giving us loans and strengthening our muscles by giving us chances to do planning and decision making. We do these practically.
Epic Change does not leave us to be passive recipients but active participants. It helps and encourages entrepreneurship and initiative in our community; which brings economic empowerment.
This is the only way a community can be taught how to fish, and not only be given a fish.
I wish other organizations could come up with this approach, there would be great change in our community!
Lucy
When we originally conceptualized Epic Change, we knew two things:
- We knew nothing about building a school in Africa.
- Mama Lucy did.
Therefore, you’ll see from the earliest documentation of our organization that our first, and most important, core value is local leadership. Epic Change does not design, develop or implement community improvements. We do not build schools. We’ve simply created an experimental business model that we hope will enable us to create a renewable source of capital to invest in the crucial efforts of grassroots change agents across the globe like Mama Lucy. While she calls our approach “participatory,” Mama Lucy does far more than participate. She independently founded and is leading this effort. As she mentions, she does the “planning and decision making.” After all, she created the school, and made it successful, long before we ever arrived. The vision is hers to realize, along with the parents’ committee, the amazing staff of teachers she’s hired and, of course, her students.
I recently ran across a link to the film They Come in the Name of Helping by Peter Brock on Peter Dietz’s Social Actions blog. The film takes a critical look at the effectiveness of foreign development programs through the eyes of young adults living in Sierra Leone. They offer thought-provoking perspectives on the value of local involvement in identifying the needs of a particular community and the solutions that are most appropriate in a given cultural context. It’s definitely worth spending some time to take a look, and provides some compelling reasons why locally-led initiatives likely have the greatest potential for success.
In it, 24-year-old journalist Zainab Kamara says:
“They [i.e., foreign aid workers] come in the name of…solving the problem, in which they don’t even have an iota of an idea…When they come, they just say, ‘we have the solution to your problem; don’t worry, we’re here.’ So their assurance is there; we’re just waiting on them to solve the problem. Instead of telling us that you [i.e., local people] have the solution to your problems, all they’ll do is say, ‘we have the solutions to your problem, so just wait on us and we’ll solve the problem.’”
Mama Lucy knows the problem, has the solution and waits for no one. As it should be.
How do you feel about our approach as Mama Lucy has shared it? Given what you know about our partnership with her, do you have suggestions for how we could improve our approach? Do you have any questions for Mama Lucy – or for us? Any other insights from watching Brock’s film?
Posted: May 21st, 2008 under The Foundry, Updates from Mama.
Comments: 6